Writing Contemporary Worship Music: A Webinar

worship-leaders

You’ve got a problem.  You feel the Lord calling you to a career as a chart-topping, face-shredding rock star, but you feel guilty about the sex, drugs, and sex that inevitably accompany super stardom.  Your solution?  Become a worship leader!  Get the groupies, the Facebook fanpages, and the all-you-can-drink booze buffets you’ve always wanted while keeping your conscience squeaky clean!

Now, before you run off to Colorado Springs and start a band, I should tell you, it takes more than non-threatening good looks and a severely inflated ego to become the mouthpiece of the church.  You need a catchy ditty that people of all ages will relate to without fully understanding.  Sounds daunting right?  Wrong.  Thanks to advances in modern science, we’ve simplified effective worship song writing into a single, can’t miss formula.  Just follow the template below and people will be saying “Dave Crowder who?” by this time next month.

First you want to state who your song is addressed to.

Jeeeeesuuuuus.

To avoid confusion, you will then want to distinguish this Jesus from the one who mows your lawn.

Sovereign Lord of all creation.

Perfect.  Next, let everyone know how cool you think Jesus is with a disjointed list of laudatory adjectives.

Holy, Incredible, Awesome, Invincible, Phantasmagorical!

Having established the high regard you have for the second member of the Trinity, you will next want to describe the extravagant lengths you go to to demonstrate your love.

Falling before you / forever adore you / always want more of you / doing my chores for you / making some s’mores for you.

Then comes the pre-chorus.  This is an integral part of your song wherein you ratchet up the emotional fervor until it reaches critical mass just as the chorus begins.  Use this time to describe the many-faceted complexity of your relationship with the Savior.

I love you / you love me / we’re best friends as friends as can be (repeat 4x).

By the fourth repetition, the instrumental accompaniment should have reached a crescendo loud enough to drown out the vocalists, though they are now shouting at the top of their lungs.  In this frenzied state you will transition into the chorus.

Regardless of your song’s message, the chorus should always follow the same format: repeated shouts of adoration intermingled with requests that those in attendance join you in singing.  If you have trouble coming up with the right words, feel free to borrow liberally from other musicians.

Jesus, you’re so hiiiiiigh, high above me / you’re so lovely! / Sing it with me! / You’re so hiiiiigh, high above me / you’re so lovely.

After the chorus, the assembled worshippers will likely need a breather and a sweat rag.  Those who have been slain in the spirit will probably need medical attention.  As the puppet master of this whole scene, it is considered good form to bring things down a notch for the second verse.

In the interest of time and efficiency, feel free to copy and paste the lyrics from the first verse into the second one.  If you feel you must, it is acceptable to modify the list of adjectives from line three.  While some consider this to be extravagant and needlessly showy, it is a great way to keep your disciples on their toes.

Insurmountable, indestructible, unassailable, super-fantastical!

The second verse is, of course, followed again by the pre-chorus and the chorus.

After the second chorus, you will want to give the hand raisers and ribbon dancers a brief respite before the home stretch.  A “bridge” is a popular way to do this without letting their heart rates or endorphins return to normal levels.  The bridge is an important interlude, often accompanied by a key change, which serves to connect the second chorus to the third without subjecting the performer to the artistic degradation of a third verse.

Again, feel free to borrow lyrics from chick flicks, romance novels, or Seventeen Magazine.

You are the one, the only one for me. / Together forever, with you I’m free. / Nobody else makes me feel like you do. / Together forever, too good to be true.

Following the bridge, the chorus should be repeated 12-15 times.  Apply fog machines and laser lights as needed, and close the whole thing out with some sort of explosion and/or stage dive.

And there you have it.   Get some hair gel, buy a few graphic T’s, master the G-C-D chord progression, and prepare yourself for your new life as the second incarnation of worship-rock god, Chris Tomlin.

See you at Passion 2010.

Popularity: 95% [?]

About the author

Hailing from the great state of Oklahoma, Kent Woodyard was raised in a tepee by an uneducated family of country singers and Native Americans. He taught himself to read by studying a book of knock-knock jokes he found at a cattle auction (thus, his highly refined sense of bourgeois humor). For the last seven years he has been toiling faithfully as "the coolest kid you haven't met yet." He retired from that position the minute you read this. Kent counts Jared Fogle (the guy from the Subway commercials), Keith Olbermann, all the members of Nickelback, and Scar from The Lion King as personal enemies. When Kent grows up, he plans to have enough money to have all these people imprisoned for no reason whatsoever. As of this writing, Kent is acutely interested in the following: weekends, push pops, Disney sing-alongs, Lost discussion boards, widgets, Whoppers (the hamburgers, not the disgusting malt balls), Mongolian throat singers, and the early work of Billy Crystal.
  • Amber

    Sir Kent, you are a brilliant writer! You put David Sedaris to shame! Bravo my friend bravo!

  • Amber

    Sir Kent, you are a brilliant writer! You put David Sedaris to shame! Bravo my friend bravo!

  • sunil

    i love to work with you.
    this is grate hope for me.May God bless u richly in every ur new steps.
    regards
    sunil ghouri.

  • sunil

    i love to work with you.
    this is grate hope for me.May God bless u richly in every ur new steps.
    regards
    sunil ghouri.

  • http://www.logoscommunity.com Pastor Tom

    This was good. phantasmagorically good.
    Undeniable, and unquenchable. It was songalicious, and tasty.
    Thanks for being hilarious.
    I’m making smores for you was my favorite line. Keep it up boys. Soon you will be the rock stars of the satirical web.

  • http://www.logoscommunity.com Pastor Tom

    This was good. phantasmagorically good.
    Undeniable, and unquenchable. It was songalicious, and tasty.
    Thanks for being hilarious.
    I’m making smores for you was my favorite line. Keep it up boys. Soon you will be the rock stars of the satirical web.

  • http://BoobsForWorship.com Trent

    Kent:

    Very nice. I think you are forgetting an extremely important aspect though: if modern worship music is anything (and I should know having led worship in every church i was a part of from 6th to 12th grade…I knew every worship cd coming out on three continents weekly…biatch)…if it is anything, it is a song sung in orgasmic ecstasy.

    A) Worship songs should be sung by men (thanks Darlene, you had your heyday).
    B) These men should be extremely sexually frustrated.
    C) These sexually frustrated, “lead-worshippers” should be singing to young tween and teen girls.
    D) These men should grope their guitars and produce as much breathe as non-humanly possible in between their vocal spasms….”Behe…heeee…neeaaarrrr….ahhhh….oohhhhhh……Goooooooddddd…..eeeeehhhh….moooorrreee!” Just see Shane&Shane. They know how to get the place… SOAKED with the almighty’s presence….or some sort of presence.

    Trent.

    ps. the most serious problem to me about the modern worship thugs is the following: Evangelical Christians lack the resources to properly deal with tragedy and suffering in relationship to their faith. Modern, American Christian faith is only always victorious, up-beat, encouraging, and tonally accessible and quick to achieve resolution. The black gospel tradition understands this much better believing that the Christian experience is always and continually about “Blues on Friday and Gospel on Sunday.”

    Evangelical worship undermines the recognition that Christian faith is this really impossible thing at times–a cross, uncomfortable, not tonally accessible always, causing discontent, etc. The result, at least in my experience, is that when people inevitably DO face these various hardships, their faith has very little to say to them, and the Church is not interested in dealing with these “distractors,” and thus a new margin is created…a post-evangelical or somewhat post-Christian margin…the us–people trying to ask very honestly (and not so honestly), “why doesn’t the Church deal honestly with all the life processes? Why is it propagating an unsustainable notion of life?” The Church alienating honest, loving Christians is a very sad thing….it’s….INDESCRIBABLE.

  • http://BoobsForWorship.com Trent

    Kent:

    Very nice. I think you are forgetting an extremely important aspect though: if modern worship music is anything (and I should know having led worship in every church i was a part of from 6th to 12th grade…I knew every worship cd coming out on three continents weekly…biatch)…if it is anything, it is a song sung in orgasmic ecstasy.

    A) Worship songs should be sung by men (thanks Darlene, you had your heyday).
    B) These men should be extremely sexually frustrated.
    C) These sexually frustrated, “lead-worshippers” should be singing to young tween and teen girls.
    D) These men should grope their guitars and produce as much breathe as non-humanly possible in between their vocal spasms….”Behe…heeee…neeaaarrrr….ahhhh….oohhhhhh……Goooooooddddd…..eeeeehhhh….moooorrreee!” Just see Shane&Shane. They know how to get the place… SOAKED with the almighty’s presence….or some sort of presence.

    Trent.

    ps. the most serious problem to me about the modern worship thugs is the following: Evangelical Christians lack the resources to properly deal with tragedy and suffering in relationship to their faith. Modern, American Christian faith is only always victorious, up-beat, encouraging, and tonally accessible and quick to achieve resolution. The black gospel tradition understands this much better believing that the Christian experience is always and continually about “Blues on Friday and Gospel on Sunday.”

    Evangelical worship undermines the recognition that Christian faith is this really impossible thing at times–a cross, uncomfortable, not tonally accessible always, causing discontent, etc. The result, at least in my experience, is that when people inevitably DO face these various hardships, their faith has very little to say to them, and the Church is not interested in dealing with these “distractors,” and thus a new margin is created…a post-evangelical or somewhat post-Christian margin…the us–people trying to ask very honestly (and not so honestly), “why doesn’t the Church deal honestly with all the life processes? Why is it propagating an unsustainable notion of life?” The Church alienating honest, loving Christians is a very sad thing….it’s….INDESCRIBABLE.

  • esther

    Rich is now a fan. I showed him your Brett Farve article which led to the worship webinar. Entertaining for sure. We even read the bantar and the satire apologetics at the end.

  • esther

    Rich is now a fan. I showed him your Brett Farve article which led to the worship webinar. Entertaining for sure. We even read the bantar and the satire apologetics at the end.

  • Conor Manning

    Trent:
    One reason for worship being so “upbeat” could be found in the very definition of worship: the feeling or expression of reverence and adoration for a deity. It doesn’t say “piss and moan about how much life isn’t going your way” its about finding reasons to thank God despite your current life situation. Teaching is for dealing with life’s issues, and helping people grow on a personal level, worship is about honoring God for being God.

    That being said, I can’t listen to Christian radio, I also find the songs repetitive and childish. I don’t understand how singing that “I am a friend of God, He calls me friend” is expressing reverence or adoration for anything…

  • Conor Manning

    Trent:
    One reason for worship being so “upbeat” could be found in the very definition of worship: the feeling or expression of reverence and adoration for a deity. It doesn’t say “piss and moan about how much life isn’t going your way” its about finding reasons to thank God despite your current life situation. Teaching is for dealing with life’s issues, and helping people grow on a personal level, worship is about honoring God for being God.

    That being said, I can’t listen to Christian radio, I also find the songs repetitive and childish. I don’t understand how singing that “I am a friend of God, He calls me friend” is expressing reverence or adoration for anything…

  • brahms

    “To be fair, couldn’t you write similar satire directed at *any* genre of popular music? I mean…blues, 80’s rock ballads, grunge, dance tunes, disco… There’s a lampoon-able cookie cutter for nearly every genre out there. You might even argue that the fact of being a musical genre makes it cookie cutter-esque. The similarities that keep it properly within the genre predispose the music to formulae such as those exposed by the article.”

    Not to the extent that one can with worship music. Take, for example, Mraz, Mayer, and Jack Johnson. Similar genre, but their interpretations of that genre differ greatly in chord voicings, rhythms, and song formats. They also use many more concrete nouns and verbs than do the vast majority of praise songs.

    I would say the next most cliche style to worship music is country music… and even it does better at stepping outside the box.

    I blame it on the oversimplification of people’s comprehension of the spiritual world. That and an unwillingness to learn how to craft songs better.

  • brahms

    “To be fair, couldn’t you write similar satire directed at *any* genre of popular music? I mean…blues, 80’s rock ballads, grunge, dance tunes, disco… There’s a lampoon-able cookie cutter for nearly every genre out there. You might even argue that the fact of being a musical genre makes it cookie cutter-esque. The similarities that keep it properly within the genre predispose the music to formulae such as those exposed by the article.”

    Not to the extent that one can with worship music. Take, for example, Mraz, Mayer, and Jack Johnson. Similar genre, but their interpretations of that genre differ greatly in chord voicings, rhythms, and song formats. They also use many more concrete nouns and verbs than do the vast majority of praise songs.

    I would say the next most cliche style to worship music is country music… and even it does better at stepping outside the box.

    I blame it on the oversimplification of people’s comprehension of the spiritual world. That and an unwillingness to learn how to craft songs better.

  • Nate

    Kent,
    I believe that first kings passage you shared earlier was Elijah mocking the pagan priests for thinking their gods could start a fire on their alter. Probably a little different situation mocking someone so sure of their “god” and mocking fellow brothers in Christ. I think this piece is witty and funny if it’s purely to poke fun at how something looks, but if you’re actually trying to get ppl to reconsider the way they worship, is this the best way?

  • Nate

    Kent,
    I believe that first kings passage you shared earlier was Elijah mocking the pagan priests for thinking their gods could start a fire on their alter. Probably a little different situation mocking someone so sure of their “god” and mocking fellow brothers in Christ. I think this piece is witty and funny if it’s purely to poke fun at how something looks, but if you’re actually trying to get ppl to reconsider the way they worship, is this the best way?

  • http://thetalkingmirror.com Kent

    Nate,

    Thanks for the comment. I agree there is a difference between mocking pagan priests and mocking a brother in Christ, but I disagree that satire is appropriate in one setting and inappropriate in the other. The Bible doesn’t really advocate one standard of behavior toward non-Christians and another toward Christians. We’re supposed to treat everyone with love and “love our neighbors as ourselves” be they pagans or fellow parishioners.

    The question then becomes: is satire an acceptable form of Christian discourse or is it not? I feel that it is and I believe scripture supports it. Look at the life of Christ. He was a Jew and yet he directed his harshest language at his Jewish “brothers” in positions of spiritual leadership. He never shied away from an opportunity to make the Pharisees look foolish. Why then should we hesitate in ridiculing church leaders when they engage in what we believe to be destructive activities/teachings (i.e. greedy televangelists, watered-down megachurch theology, superficial worship songs, Joel Osteen, etc)?

    As to whether satire is the “best way” to effect change. No, it’s probably not “the best way.” But it is a way. The best way would probably be to do what Stuart Townsend, Chris Rice, and others are doing and write challenging, theologically-driven worship songs that present people with a more meaningful alternative. Unfortunately, I don’t play an instrument and I have a terrible singing voice. So I post satirical articles on my website. I don’t think I’m going to spark a revolution in the worship industry, but I do believe I am adding a valuable perspective to the conversation. I’d have a hard time doing this if I didn’t think it was worth something.

    -Kent

  • http://thetalkingmirror.com Kent

    Nate,

    Thanks for the comment. I agree there is a difference between mocking pagan priests and mocking a brother in Christ, but I disagree that satire is appropriate in one setting and inappropriate in the other. The Bible doesn’t really advocate one standard of behavior toward non-Christians and another toward Christians. We’re supposed to treat everyone with love and “love our neighbors as ourselves” be they pagans or fellow parishioners.

    The question then becomes: is satire an acceptable form of Christian discourse or is it not? I feel that it is and I believe scripture supports it. Look at the life of Christ. He was a Jew and yet he directed his harshest language at his Jewish “brothers” in positions of spiritual leadership. He never shied away from an opportunity to make the Pharisees look foolish. Why then should we hesitate in ridiculing church leaders when they engage in what we believe to be destructive activities/teachings (i.e. greedy televangelists, watered-down megachurch theology, superficial worship songs, Joel Osteen, etc)?

    As to whether satire is the “best way” to effect change. No, it’s probably not “the best way.” But it is a way. The best way would probably be to do what Stuart Townsend, Chris Rice, and others are doing and write challenging, theologically-driven worship songs that present people with a more meaningful alternative. Unfortunately, I don’t play an instrument and I have a terrible singing voice. So I post satirical articles on my website. I don’t think I’m going to spark a revolution in the worship industry, but I do believe I am adding a valuable perspective to the conversation. I’d have a hard time doing this if I didn’t think it was worth something.

    -Kent

Powered by WordPress

More in Religion (36 of 60 articles)


The Lord God Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth, announced yesterday that final edits have been completed on his much ...